Writing your way to a PhD

I’ve often written about research taking priority over writing, because it’s only possible to write a good thesis if you have well-executed research to report. This doesn’t mean though that writing is unimportant; as an academic, your success depends on being able to use writing communicate clearly and build a coherent argument (in your thesis and in published papers).

There is a requirement in many PhD programmes to produce writing throughout the course of your PhD, and even if this isn’t the case it’s important for many to develop their skills as writers. So while I maintain that the research should be the priority, that doesn’t mean writing should be totally neglected by everyone.

So how should you approach writing throughout your PhD in a way that’ll be useful to you later?

Limit the scope

It doesn’t make sense to start writing thesis chapters from the start of your PhD, because it’s impossible to write with confidence about your research until you’ve done the work, and because your knowledge and view of your topic should change greatly over the course of several years.

If you start by writing chapters it’s easy to get overwhelmed by the scale of the task. Many of the students I’ve worked with have ended up with hundreds of pages but with nothing actually finished. The resulting mess is very hard to sort out, which can be extremely stressful and demoralising.

Live Webinar

How to write your PhD thesis: The secrets of academic writing

21st November 2018 2018

Click here for details

It’s better to reduce the scale of the task. Forget about writing chapters for now, and instead write short pieces with a narrow scope that you can actually finish. Some of these can form the basis of chapter sections later.

Why start small?

Just spending time writing is not enough to become better at it; especially if you just churn out words without thought and switch to writing about something else whenever you hit a block.

To write well you need to be able to assess and adapt your own work (see training the inner writing critic). If you can’t do this on a small scale then you definitely won’t be able to do it on a large scale; it’s much easier to practice and learn with something smaller and simpler than an entire thesis.

An example

During my research I used quite a few different experimental techniques, but because the importance of each one changed as my project developed it would have been impossible to write a good methodology chapter in the early stages of my PhD.

As a way of developing my understanding of the techniques or as a way of practicing writing though, I could have written short essays on each. Taking atomic force microscopy for example, I could have written 1000 words on the historical development of the technique, or the theory behind it, or on analysis and interpretation of data.

By narrowing the focus in this way, limiting the length and the scope of the writing, the task becomes achievable. You can take care over clarity of expression, you can take the time to make sure you understand the fundamentals, you can think about the order of and relationship between a small number of key points and you can rearrange and sharpen up the writing as you go.

Most importantly you can get the writing to look finished, with a continuous flow from beginning to end, rather than developing the habit of always leaving things partially done.

When you come to write your thesis later, you will have these sections of writing to refer back to. There will be much that you don’t use, but you can select the best bits and maybe even improve upon them as you decide where best to put them.

Note: while writing about a subject can help with your own understanding, you must get practical experience of the techniques you want to use too. I spent many hundreds of hours using atomic force microscopes during my PhD- knowing the theory is not enough!

Developing arguments through writing

You can use a similar approach to develop a complex argument by first focusing on small sections with a narrow scope.

This way you can use writing as a means of inquiry, exploring the subtleties or logical consequences from multiple angles. Writing this way can often lead to new insights, simply because you’re thinking intensively about a specific question, problem or idea.

Again, much of what you write won’t end up in your thesis, and you might not know what the most valuable content is until later, but take your time and do it carefully anyway. By repeating this process of narrow-but-deep investigation you’ll start to notice links between your ideas.

Here’s an example; in trying to define what a PhD is, I arrived at the conclusion that it’s about developing the skills of a professional researcher. Later, when writing about the thesis defence, I realised that defending your work in front of a panel of examiners is a form of peer-review, which makes sense if they are testing your ability as a professional academic. Realising what the examiners are looking for (and how this differs from undergraduate exams) then gave insight into other aspects of the work, and ultimately that became the basis of my book.

Thinking deeply about small, manageable aspects helps to understand the whole. You can then construct an argument from well-examined component parts, rather than churning out words without thought and hoping something good emerges, or trying to edit down from a mass of unstructured thought.

See also
Doing a PhD and writing a thesis are not the same thing!

Monkey-typing

I know you're probably busy right now...

Would you like to receive my top 7 articles to read in your own time? These are some of the most important principles I think every PhD student (or academic) should know. Enter your name and email and I'll send you one per day for the next 7 days.

Privacy policy

We won't send you spam. Unsubscribe at any time. Your email will never be shared with anyone. Powered by ConvertKit

10 thoughts on “Writing your way to a PhD

  1. Hi Dr Hayton,
    I wish to ask if a PhD can merge two topics, for example, doing a PhD study including a Nutrition part and functional development and evaluation. Is it possible to do works on the two subjects then include in the thesis. The second part, i.e the functional food development and evaluation will depend on the first subject.

    Thank you very much.

    Best Regards,
    Sabriino Clair

    • In principle, yes, it’s absolutely possible. It depends of course on the practicality of your specific proposal and having access to the relevant resources and support.

  2. Hi James,

    I have a question after reading your blog and watching one of your lectures on youtube.

    What about practicing sports as a way of releasing stress during PhD? Did you do something during your PhD time?

    Thanks,

    • I was an international competitor in aikido, training 6 times a week and coaching too. I wouldn’t suggest everyone do that much, but doing some form of physical activity is a great way of escaping the stress of a PhD.

      For me, being physically active is a necessity- I won’t sacrifice that for anything and I would have quit my PhD if I’d been unable to train because of it

  3. Hi James,

    Thank you for this advice. I can definitely agree, start with small bits and go deep, then try to join them. I am currently in my third year (FT Business School) PhD and I have lots of long unfinished writings that have been stressing me out. I have been drowning in the literature, trying to find that argument for too long. This year I focused on my data and what is coming out, listening and focusing. I am finding myself writing new pieces, discovering nuances, links, and completely rewriting chapters focusing on what’s relevant. Papers that I have been reading in my previous years suddenly make sense, hallelujah:)

  4. it had been a long time since I am following your posts on PhD study.
    I found that it is a very good thing you are you doing. These advices are crucial for current and future PhD students.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.